I am an Aaron Sorkin fan, just to make that clear. I loved the West Wing; it might be my
favorite show of all time. Studio 60 was
ok, and probably deserved a 2nd season. But with the bidding war and
excessive rights fees I can totally see why it didn’t make it past season 1.
The Newsroom is probably a bit better than Studio 60 and not
as good as The West Wing. Which isn’t
quite fair, WW took a season to really hit its stride, and Studio 60
started slow too. The Newsroom so far
has lurched along. Some episodes
inducing cringes and some episodes showing flashes of Sorkin’s previous
brilliance. Quick take on the first 5.
- “We Just Decided Too” - very good pilot, and average episode. Pilots are tough because you got to get people caring about characters you just introduced. The beginning rant was awesome and right in the snappy banter sweet spot.
- “News Night 2.0” - lame. It’s hard to buy that the ‘best EP there is’ is such a moron with email.
- “The 112th Congress” – lame. Although watching Jeff Daniels smack down the Tea Party was fun. This episode covered 6 months in an hour. It finally does introduce the bad guys though, stupid upper management.
- “I’ll try to fix you” - good. I really liked the depiction of everyday life and petty squabbles getting put on hold when something really important happens.
- “Amen” – good. Explored the difficulty and consequences of trying to cover Arab Spring.
Which brings us to “Bullies”
Bullies was good, but frustrating. By my count there were 3 recycled West Wing
plot elements.
#1 – Gay Republican refuses to be defined solely by his
sexual orientation. This right out of “The Portland Trip” Quoting from that Wiki article
“Josh
spends the evening discussing an anti-gay marriage bill (similar to the actual
1996 Defense of Marriage Act) with a gay
Republican congressman, and can't really understand how a gay man could throw
his support behind a measure that says he's a lesser citizen of the U.S. The
Congressman says that he agrees with most of the Republican agenda and doesn't
have to base his entire life around his sexuality, but does show visible
contempt when some GOP colleagues fawn over his efforts in support of the bill.”
#2 – Primary protagonist reluctantly
seeks therapy because he can’t sleep, and it is revealed that both male leads
were abused by their fathers. “Five Nights”
#3 – Snarky bodyguard watches
over reluctant principle; CJ Craig in West Wing and Will McAvoy in Newsroom. This is pretty much Mark Harmon’s character Simon
Donovan. This one bugged me the
least because the story arc will not be the same, at least I doubt there will
be sexual tension. Plus the snark was
really entertaining and the bodyguard might be my favorite character on the
show.
So why does this matter?
It’s actually praise worthy to
draw inspiration from previous works.
The classics are classic for a reason and very little is truly
original. When you crib near verbatim
you are turning your show into West Wing’s greatest hits. And
if the show keeps going in this direction I will just sign up for Amazon Prime
and stream WW’s reruns.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSo far I like it quite a lot. I thought Damon Gupton, the actor that portrayed the former Chief of Staff of Rick Santorum, was wasted on such a small role as he was phenomenal.
ReplyDeleteThe advantage I have is I never really watched the West Wing. I only caught a couple of episodes and it didn't really grab me.
This show I am enjoying quite a lot, even though I agree that there are elements that really strain credulity like the Executive Producer not being able to use email. I don't completely hate how Sorkin is pushing the envelope in an effort to identify new ways to disseminate information without resorting to a narrator, but he is definitely pushing the envelope.